« WPP Admits Holding Company Model Does Not Work! | Main | TV to Support Online? »

Brands in The Digital Age - by Bill Kanarick

I had my first ever glass of Johnny Walker Blue Scotch not long ago. Scotch is my drink of choice and I was excited at the prospect of trying what many have told me was going to be the best scotch I have ever had. And sure enough it was. The whole experience, from the feel of the weight of the glass in my hand to the warm flow of the scotch down my throat to the satisfying burn I felt as it passed into my system were all exactly what I had imagined. It was a great experience. And, it got me thinking. Mind you I only had one so it was definitely not alcohol induced thinking. I wondered whether it actually tasted that good because in fact it is that good or because I expected, and in fact my mind believed it was going to be that good. Of course, the answer is both. I was pre-conditioned toward a positive experience and the product delivered. So yes, the distillers, the packagers, and the distributors all did their job to create a positive experience for me. But of course so did the advertiser who pre-conditioned me for the experience. Advertising heightened my expectations and the product delivered. Exactly as it should be.

 

Of course this mental rambling got me thinking about brands in general. I thought about chocolate and then instantly of Hershey, I thought about high performance cars and then of BMW. Of family entertainment and then Disney. Of soft drink and then Coke. You get my drift. Think of the power of this. In the famous book “Positioning The Battle for the Mind of the Consumer” Al Reis and Jack Trout talked about the power of occupying space in the consumers mind. Owning a word, a concept, basically a brand. And as my stream of consciousness reminded me, once that brand sits in that space in ones mind it is very difficult to replace. Clearly a combination of factors contribute to my positive association with the brands I mention above, but advertising has to be top of the list. Multiple impressions served over a long period of time with great impact and I was hooked. In fact, I started thinking, all driven by that glass of scotch, that this was exactly why I got into advertising in the first place. To build brands and help clients own the hearts and minds of their consumers.

 

But then I was struck by the sobering thought (to carry the drinking analogy further) that at present I was not really in the advertising business. I am in the interactive advertising business and today there is a clear difference. Interactive agencies don’t own the brands, or more specifically are not chiefly tasked by brand managers to be the primary voice of the brand in the marketplace. Sure we get to express the brand in a given channel. But its kind of like the difference between leasing and buying. Traditional agencies own the car outright, it sits in the driveway fully paid for. Interactive shops may get to play with the car ,but it’s a short term lease and eventually you need to give it back. Interactive shops are experts. Need a web site built you go to an interactive shop. A banner campaign, we’re your guys. Need analytics work to better understand consumer behavior and our phones ring. Don’t get me wrong it’s great. As technology has advanced our industry has quite literally boomed. The things you can do now to target and then acquire and retain customers is absolutely staggering. In fact our industry is booming for good reason, our brand of advertising is highly effective and highly measureable. We can clearly tell clients that for every dollar paid this is what was returned. It is very satisfying, and I am proud of the work we do. But is it memorable? 

On a recent Sunday afternoon I was watching football, and of course with that comes a steady stream of car advertising. An ad campaign that has caught my attention of late is for Cadillac. It features Kate Walsh (the attractive red head from Grays Anatomy) and as she drives over a bridge she asks the question “When you turn you car on does it return the favor?” Great line. And a great question. But then I asked myself, when did it happen? At what point did Cadillac get to the point where they could ask that question and I would even think it made sense coming from them. After all my grandfather drove a Cadillac. Of course he did it with two hands on the top of the steering wheel at 30 miles an hour in a 45 mile an hour zone en route to the local diner for a cup of coffee. When did Cadillac get sexy? Get modern? Get relevant to a younger demographic? More importantly, how? Again advertising. This brings me back to my brand stream of consciousness. Cadillac did something amazing. They changed my association with the brand. They repositioned the brand in my mind to the point where I now think of Kate Walsh before I think of my grandfather. Granted Kate Walsh is more attractive than my grandfather but over some period of time the advertisers for Cadillac supplanted a deep rooted perception of the brand, formed over may years with a new one seemingly created and formed in less time with arguably more impact, After all, it is much more difficult to re-position a brand than it is to own un-occupied space in the consumers mind. Think Sylvester Stallone and comedy and your get my drift.

 Of course, again I thought of my role as an executive in the interactive advertising business and more importantly if the huge impact that interactive advertising has had on the automotive industry. It is among the two largest categories of on-line advertising spending billions per year. Eight out of 10 new car buyers are “internet influenced” in their purchasing decision. We’re for real. You can’t buy, and therefore today you can’t sell a car without us. We helped Cadillac sell more cars. It’s an absolute fact. But we did that after the buyer was pre-disposed to consider the brand. On-line advertising did not re-position the brand. It harvested demand that was created elsewhere. An important job, as is being the middle inning reliever or the closer, we’re just not the Cy Young award winning starting pitcher. But here is the payoff – “yet”. That’s right. I said yet.

My prediction is that today’s interactive agencies will grow to become true brand stewards. As digital channels proliferate and steal share from more mainstream channels like broadcast, advertisers have been forced to think of their agency lineup differently You could keep the Interactive shop at the kids table when Interactive consumed single digit percentages of your overall spend but as that percentage grows the role of the Interactive shop has grown to be more prominent. But even more importantly, channels are still silhoed because technology has not digitized them all yet. But that’s coming. With advances in set top box technology and rising DVR penetration isn’t TV or broadcast advertising Interactive advertising? Of course the answer is yes. And therefore, as an advertiser who do you look toward to do the work? Do you look for an interactive agency? A traditional above the line agency? The answer is that increasingly you will be less inclined to make that distinction. As an advertiser you will invite all agencies to pitch for your business. Today you might include a cross section of agency types as that category distinction remains. But over time that will be less and less the case. That is of course if one thing happens. If todays digital shops can inspire. Sure we can be smarter. The logical buyer is always going to love is. But can we tug the heart strings? Can we come up with the big idea? Can we express the brand not only with precision and accuracy against the target consumer but with vibrancy, energy, and passion? I guess it all depends on your motivations. And how you see your role in the world. Are you a creator or an enabler? The world will need both. But the real prize sits at being the creator.

 

This weekend, I watched the Target Challenge Golf Tournament. It was played at the Sherwood country Club in Southern California. It was an absolutely beautiful course. And during the broadcast the announcers mentioned, multiple times, that it was a Jack Nickaulaus designed golf course. Not once did they mention the name of the greenskeeper.

 

I sure hope the advertising agencies have enjoyed the last few decades. They have left an indelible mark in the hearts and minds of many consumers. They have created much of todays consumer culture. And they should be proud. But to them I say, have a glass of Johnny Walker Blue and remember, we still need mainframes. 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://65.181.178.94/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/gaston/managed-mt/mt-tb.cgi/33

Comments (2)

John M:

Great article, I can totally relate.

It’s like my self proclaimed slogan for Oreo Cookies, and that is: There is no cookie like an Oreo Cookie!". True addiction right there... can’t stop until there are none left!!! Not sure if its the taste that tastes so good with a glass of milk or if its the whole experience of breaking the cookie in two like in the commercials, and then eating that makes the whole experience so great.

But like you say, the commercials hyped the experience, and those damn Oreo Cookies sure deliver!

rupensharma2001@yahoo.com:

...maybe Sapient should venture of and buy a traditional ad agency. That way, we get to own the brand, create all those facy interactive stuff, and forever alter the 'learner's' mental model. The end-to-end experience is what it's all about.

Nice post!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 19, 2007 1:44 PM.

The previous post in this blog was WPP Admits Holding Company Model Does Not Work!.

The next post in this blog is TV to Support Online?.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.